Don Grantham writes a considerable amount of useful information on Evolve Fuel that readers find as a beneficial resource for up to date news and information for the technology and web development industry. As a leader in this field for over 20 years, he has developed enough insight and experience to write a book. I asked him a few questions in an informal interview regarding the latest changes in the online world. Here’s how Don responded:
Q: New York Times is considering charging for web access in 2010. Facebook is considering charging a $14.99 monthly membership fee. Is this just the tip of the iceberg? What other online companies will follow suit? In a world that went from money in exchange for tangible goods and services to online free access for goods and services, how will the public respond to having to pay for their news again and paying for online social networking?
A: “There are some key business model differences in the NY Times and Facebook. People are already used to paying for the newspaper and have been ever since there have been publications. Facebook on the other hand will suffer a huge loss in its userbase. What facebook will likely do is offer a free membership to those that don’t mind more ads in their space and a limited number of features. Whereas a paying user will get ad free space along with a much more extended feature set. Giving the user a reason to pay is what the name of this game will be. This is IF they decide to get users to pay for service. What they should do is figure out how to offer up more advertising like the google empire! What if google charged everyone to use their search engine? Not gonna happen. Why? Because everyone is ok with how they are being advertised to and google makes a fortune on their ads from those businesses willing to pay the fee. What facebook should do is create new and innovative features for the user. Grow their userbase in such a way that advertisers will be willing to pay much more than they do now for advertising because they will be reaching a much larger and broader audience.“
Q: How can we educate the public to understand the costs that are incurred into the development of these websites and applications? If a company is providing something that was created using their resources, and they are filling a need that people find valuable, what can be wrong about asking for a reimbursement or payment in exchange?
A: “People get very comfortable with “free” services. But in reality nothing is free. Take Google as an excellent example. Look at the myriad of seemingly free services they offer. The reality is the user base is being bombarded with advertising and is giving away their online habits and personal information in exchange for these services. What google has done right is to introduce these things in a way that is inconspicuous and not immediately obvious to its users.
So I don’t believe business needs to “educate” the public, rather, they should find ways of generating revenue without leaving a bitter taste in the mouths of their greatest asset, the user. There are many countless and successful examples of this philosophy and business process. All anyone needs to do is pick one and try and take it to the next level and do it better. This is why MySpace is failing and Facebook is booming. The moment you alienate your users, they’ll move on to the “next big thing” and there will always be someone there to make it for them. By the way, Twitter is a unique example of promise. Google was there once too – they didn’t always have ads. So twitter doesn’t make money. That’s right! Zero. So how the heck do they stay in business? Employees, rent, servers, overhead, etc. —— INVESTORS. They have developed a very simple platform really – I mean you leave messages and people follow you. Not that hard a concept. And they are getting everyone used to the service “for free” and growing their user base. What they are doing is trying to reach a critical mass of users. At which point they will monetize by putting up ads, selling merchandise or start charging users for extended services, (like I pointed out in the facebook model). Marketing products on Twitter is a potentially more interesting idea from a revenue perspective. Incidentally, late last year, Dell reported that it had made over $1.5 million in revenue thanks to Twitter. More recently, Dell announced it would start offering exclusive deals to users who follow its accounts on Twitter. Hmmm… Whats a brewin…?“
Q: What is to come of the virtual world really? The internet has filled such a huge demand that is growing rapidly. Shall we reassess the rules of supply and demand?
A: “The internet is ever evolving and changing and the way we engage with it has been changing along the way. From the early pioneering dial-up days of AOL, Prodigy & Compuserve all the way up to now – some 20 years later. The rules are constantly changing. What doesn’t change is human nature. Human nature is predictable. Supply and demand will always be there. And where no demand exists innovative business will create one. One word: iPhone. Everyone that has one has said to me “I cant live without it”. Yet what did they do before they had it? Creation of demand. Genius.“
Well, there you go! Good discussion.
Thanks for reading!

And the demo looks good! It’s slick. It’s easy to use. It looks like everything you need—and it’s already up and running!
Enjoy your free NYTimes online? Get ready to pay in 2011 –
Why would you want to use Twitter, especially given its extremely small message size and lack of internal integration with any media other than text?