Archive for the 'Future' Category

What Facebook Co-Founder, Mark Zuckerberg Really Means:

A common mistake in communication lies between how the message is sent and how it is received. When you read the comments to the letter that Mark Zuckerberg posted last Tuesday, you will see a good example of miscommunication. This article is written to help translate what Mark Zuckerberg said, and what we believe he actually meant.

It has become apparent to me after reviewing comments to the “Open Letter from Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg” regarding the upcoming changes to the Facebook platform, that many have read, but not quite understood what is to come of Facebook. I admit, it was difficult to find actual comments about this new change after sifting through the cheap guerrilla marketing posts, but I managed to read some posts from Facebook users who are truly concerned about what is to come of their favorite online social networking group. Some users posted suggestions about more changes that they want Facebook to make, while some posted threats to stop using Facebook if any more changes are made. I even ran across comments from readers who believed that this letter was about customizing your wall/profile page to be more like MySpace. Perhaps the confusion among these select readers came from the way the letter was written.

That’s quite alright. I think I have a pretty good filter for decoding what was said and what was actually meant. I have broken it down one paragraph at a time and translated it into lamense terms for those who aren’t expected to naturally understand organizational strategy for the online world.  The quoted text is from Mark Zuckerberg (what he said). The paragraphed text is broken down (what he meant).

Here you go:

Open Letter from Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg; Broken Down

“It has been a great year for making the world more open and connected. Thanks to your help, more than 350 million people around the world are using Facebook to share their lives online.”

(Thank you all 350 million of you for helping Facebook help you share your lives online and stay connected.)

“To make this possible, we have focused on giving you the tools you need to share and control your information. Starting with the very first version of Facebook five years ago, we’ve built tools that help you control what you share with which individuals and groups of people. Our work to improve privacy continues today.”

(We know that one of the things that you really love about Facebook is the ability to control the information you share. That’s why we focus on making sure you can control your privacy settings. We are continuing to improve that because we know how important it has been to you.)

“Facebook’s current privacy model revolves around “networks” — communities for your school, your company or your region. This worked well when Facebook was mostly used by students, since it made sense that a student might want to share content with their fellow students.”

(Facebook’s privacy settings were designed for students to share content with each other. Now that the Facebook user base has reached way beyond the student community, we need to redesign the privacy settings to accommodate the masses.)

“Over time people also asked us to add networks for companies and regions as well. Today we even have networks for some entire countries, like India and China.”

(Once again, Facebook has reached way beyond the student community. And we have been asked by other companies and regions, such as India and China, to add a whole network for them too. This means an entire network for all of China. An entire network for all of India. An entire network for each company, organization and region, etc.)

“However, as Facebook has grown, some of these regional networks now have millions of members and we’ve concluded that this is no longer the best way for you to control your privacy. Almost 50 percent of all Facebook users are members of regional networks, so this is an important issue for us. If we can build a better system, then more than 100 million people will have even more control of their information.”

(Adding new networks resulted in a Facebook growth spurt and millions of members in these new regions and companies take up 50% of the Facebook population. It looks like it may be time to redesign our privacy settings to accommodate the growth and diversity of users.)

“The plan we’ve come up with is to remove regional networks completely and create a simpler model for privacy control where you can set content to be available to only your friends, friends of your friends, or everyone.”

(Here’s the plan; Remove regional networks. Create a simpler model for privacy control.)

“We’re adding something that many of you have asked for — the ability to control who sees each individual piece of content you create or upload. In addition, we’ll also be fulfilling a request made by many of you to make the privacy settings page simpler by combining some settings. If you want to read more about this, we began discussing this plan back in July.”

(We’re working on simplifying privacy settings and expanding your ability to control what you share.)

“Since this update will remove regional networks and create some new settings, in the next couple of weeks we’ll ask you to review and update your privacy settings. You’ll see a message that will explain the changes and take you to a page where you can update your settings. When you’re finished, we’ll show you a confirmation page so you can make sure you chose the right settings for you. As always, once you’re done you’ll still be able to change your settings whenever you want.”

(We are going to need you to update your own individual privacy settings. You will see a message that will explain the changes and will take you to a page where you can update your settings. When you’re finished, you will see a confirmation page so you can double check your work to make sure you did it right. If you didn’t do it right, and you realize that later, you can still go back and change them just like you can now.)

“We’ve worked hard to build controls that we think will be better for you, but we also understand that everyone’s needs are different. We’ll suggest settings for you based on your current level of privacy, but the best way for you to find the right settings is to read through all your options and customize them for yourself. I encourage you to do this and consider who you’re sharing with online.”

(We’ve build a system that can make suggestions on how to set your privacy controls, but you should really read through the information yourself before you start making your changes.)

“Thanks for being a part of making Facebook what it is today, and for helping to make the world more open and connected.”

(Thanks for being a part of making Facebook what it is today, and for helping to make the world more open and connected.)

“Mark Zuckerberg”

(Mark Zuckerberg)

There now. Glad we got that all cleared up.

Thanks for reading.

Is The Digital Agency Dead?

After taking part in several 2009 interactive planning sessions for various clients over the past few weeks a common question between the sessions was asked repeatedly. What are you going to do for us online? The question seems quite simple and benign on the surface, but it has almost infinite intangibles, influencers, dependencies and possibilities. And because of all those things that basic question becomes very difficult to answer and requires a very complex response. Clients are asking for their digital and online agencies to provide more than just a strategy for building a website. We have moved into a new era with the digital agency landscape and the agencies that prosper will need to respond with an evolved view of online marketing and how to integrate with other marketing mediums.

I generally break the evolution of interactive marketing strategy development into four eras;

1) The ‘hot sh*t’ era, other wise knows as the first bubble. This is when every .com start up was an IPO away from glorious riches. Accountability, for both budget and strategies, took a back seat to industry buzz and popularity. The money and BS flowed freely and everyone was trying to be the next one to cash in/out.

2) The ‘we are a serious business, seriously’ era. This is the void between the first bubble and then now ubiquitous Web 2.0 establishment where interactive agencies and ideas had to fight for credibility, and budget, to prove that online marketing was more than putting .com at the end of your name or asking for something ‘viral’ in the campaign.

3) The ‘seat at the table’ era. The bubble burst, we proved that interactive marketing could work, we had the metrics to prove it, and now we want to participate (even lead) the creation of marketing strategies and not just be the production shop building a cool website.

4) The ‘what are you going to do for me online’ era. This is the next big step for digital agencies. We’ve gotten our seat at the strategy table and now we are expected to do something that pure play digital agencies haven’t been equipped to do…think like traditional marketers.

This last era is where the simple questions start to get complicated.

Higher value clients with larger cross channel campaigns and complex business drivers are demanding a different kind of thinking from a digital agency. The go-to solution of ‘hey, lets do a website redesign’ has become antiquated and narrow…a site redesign is not an interactive strategy. Clients are asking for a true online marketing plan similar to what traditional agencies deliver for offline campaigns or brand development – a holistic solution that is more than the sum of its parts.

This is the real growth opportunity for digital, the opportunity to move upstream to the point where the overall marketing strategy is defined, it’s the ability to get ahead of the solution (and production request) and establish value as key business partner. The problem is that most digital agencies don’t have a process or resources to support that upstream mobility. Typically the digital shop has been a downstream vendor executing on an already formed marketing campaign and translating pieces of it into some sort of a web property/presence. And most digital shops have gotten very good at that role and can pull out their proprietary process, tools, strategies and technology for building you the best darn website you’ve ever seen. But what were once differentiators for digital shops have now been codified and are becoming more and more commoditized as generic production vendor services.

I have also seen the antithessis of this within the larger traditional or interactive creative agencies. They are being driven to provide more integrated solutions that go beyond the big idea which require them to own the entire interactive delivery model. Online development is very messy and requires a rigorous process that not as easy as just plugging in a production vendor and saying go. We’ve all see the traditional agency try to bolt on their ‘interactive services’ department and more often than not it is a failure. Why? Because interactive needs to be an integrated component of a strategy or campaign and not just a after thought tossed to a downstream vendor.

It will be this critical ability for agencies to demonstrate and excel at full cross-channel integration that will separate the new breed of agencies. Interactive is the future, I’ll argue that with anyone, and because of that I envision a couple of paths that digital shops can go down. The standard development/production orientated digital shops can bring in true marketing strategy services, the big idea, game changer creative types to elevate them to a lead spot at the table and drive a companies overall marketing strategy. Or these digital shops will get absorbed into larger more established creative shops to serve as integrated in-house strategy and production teams.

Either way the key is integration. To evolve pure play digital shops need to start thinking in terms of campaigns and not projects – i.e. if we are planning a Microsite for a product we can’t just focus on the creative concept and execution, but go to the clients with everything from how we drive traffic (PPC, banner, social) to what the conversions are on the site, to how we track and report to how we extend the conversations and bring them back. So it’s less about individual projects and shifts to blending communication messages across all available online media channels into a continuous brand experience. The next evolution once we move to campaign planning is to look at Integrated Marketing Campaigns were we blend all media channels, not just online. The easiest example of this is HP’s “The Computer is Personal Again” campaign. They utilized a wide range media with great consistency, and capitalized on each of the media’s individual strengths. Business Week has a great article on it here: “The goal: to do away with HP’s fragmented marketing strategy of the past and build a cohesive campaign that will work across many product lines, in all regions of the world, using print, online, and broadcast media.”

True 3D Display

true_3d_2.jpg

By using an infared laser that pulses off several reflectors to create 100 dots of plasma per second, Japan’s National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) was able to create a true three dimensional display. This technology was demonstrated at SIGGRAPH 2006, Click image above for video. Additional information here.

quote_3d.jpg

Epson Unveils 7.1″ QXGA E-Paper

flexibal_qxga_display.jpg
Epson has just unveiled a 7.1-inch QXGA display — based on LTPS-TFT (low temperature polysilicon TFT) e-paper — that features an impressive 1,536×2,048 resolution and “memory liquid crystal” technology which retains the image even when turned off. No word yet on availability.

I/O Brush

iobrush_collection.jpg

At first glance, it looks like your standard brush, but upon closer inspection you’ll find integrated LEDs, touch sensors, and a camera. The I/O Brush basically “lifts up and captures photons”, allowing artists to draw with “special ink” picked up from their immediate environment.

See the video here.




test